XLII vs. RIFR
XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while RIFR is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Russell. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.
Performance
XLII vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly higher than RIFR's 9.78% return.
XLII
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RIFR
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 15.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLII vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.30% | 6.30% |
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.78% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLII and RIFR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLII vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank
XLII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RIFR
XLII vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLII | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLII vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and RIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLII | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -6.80% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.16% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -1.66% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
XLII vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLII | RIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 10.66% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 10.68% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 10.68% | +1.44% |
XLII vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLII vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison
XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than RIFR's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF | 0.89% | 0.98% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.82% | 5.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLII and RIFR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 0.89% for RIFR.
XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while RIFR is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.59% for RIFR.
Find the right allocation for XLII and RIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer