PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 18.34%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.78% annualized return.


SPYG

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.34%
YTD
11.38%
6M
11.00%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
18.34%

SPYM

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.12%
YTD
9.79%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
15.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.38%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
9.79%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SPYM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.85

The correlation between SPYG and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYG vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SPYM

Technology

52.1%
38.0%

Communication Services

15.9%
10.1%

Financial Services

9.0%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.4%

Healthcare

5.9%
8.5%

Industrials

5.4%
8.0%

Utilities

1.2%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.8%

Energy

0.1%
3.1%

Technology

SPYG
52.1%
SPYM
38.0%

Communication Services

SPYG
15.9%
SPYM
10.1%

Financial Services

SPYG
9.0%
SPYM
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.5%
SPYM
9.4%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.9%
SPYM
8.5%

Industrials

SPYG
5.4%
SPYM
8.0%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
SPYM
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
SPYM
4.6%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
SPYM
1.8%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SPYM
1.8%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SPYM
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.02

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

13.57

-4.36

SPYG vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-54.46%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-8.90%

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-18.72%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-24.48%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-33.87%

+1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-1.73%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.28%

-7.14%

-17.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

1.98%

+1.46%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.61%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

4.61%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

9.74%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

12.39%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.34%

16.89%

+4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

18.05%

+2.69%

SPYG vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SPYM's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.60%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.28%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPYG and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to SPYM (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 15.78% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.

SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer