PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLII vs. IVEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLII vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XLII

1D
0.96%
1M
-0.49%
6M
8.98%
YTD
11.91%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.91%

IVEP

1D
0.51%
1M
-3.48%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$577.50K$624.15K$882.90K
$449.50K$324.22K$213.70K

XLII vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLII and IVEP is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.67

XLII vs. IVEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLII
IVEP

Financial Services

100.8%

-

Industrials

93.8%
45.4%

Technology

5.9%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

12.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Utilities

-

22.3%

Financial Services

XLII
100.8%
IVEP

-

Industrials

XLII
93.8%
IVEP
45.4%

Technology

XLII
5.9%
IVEP
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLII
0.3%
IVEP

-

Basic Materials

XLII

-

IVEP
2.2%

Communication Services

XLII

-

IVEP

-

Consumer Defensive

XLII

-

IVEP

-

Energy

XLII

-

IVEP
12.5%

Healthcare

XLII

-

IVEP

-

Real Estate

XLII

-

IVEP
10.1%

Utilities

XLII

-

IVEP
22.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLII vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLII
XLII Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLII Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLII Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XLII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLII Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

IVEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLII vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLIIIVEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

XLII vs. IVEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLII vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum IVEP drawdown of -17.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and IVEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIIIVEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-17.54%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-11.86%

+10.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-5.01%

+3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

Volatility

XLII vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIIIVEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

31.41%

-19.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.23%

31.41%

-19.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.23%

31.41%

-19.18%

XLII vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLII vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLII and IVEP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

XLII has the higher dividend yield at 12.08%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.75% for IVEP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLII and IVEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer