SPYG vs. SPYV
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both S&P 500 funds from State Street - SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index while SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 18.34%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for SPYV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SPYG vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 18.34%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.14% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 7.78%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
SPYG vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.38% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.78% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and SPYV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYG and SPYV has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPYG vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
SPYV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYG
SPYV
Communication Services
SPYG
SPYV
Financial Services
SPYG
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
SPYV
Healthcare
SPYG
SPYV
Industrials
SPYG
SPYV
Utilities
SPYG
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
SPYV
Real Estate
SPYG
SPYV
Basic Materials
SPYG
SPYV
Energy
SPYG
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
SPYV
SPYG vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.44 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 13.11 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -58.45% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -6.22% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -17.54% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -17.89% | -14.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -36.89% | +4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -0.96% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.28% | -8.70% | -15.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.63% | +1.81% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.88%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 2.88% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 7.32% | +6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | 9.98% | +7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 14.38% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 16.95% | +3.79% |
SPYG vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SPYG and SPYV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYG vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SPYV's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 2.14% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYG and SPYV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to SPYV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 12.14% for SPYV. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG and SPYV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.
SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer