XLE vs. NOBL
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for NOBL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
XLE vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 7.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLE having a 9.91% annualized return and NOBL not far ahead at 9.94%.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
XLE vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.43% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and NOBL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and NOBL has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLE vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
NOBL
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
NOBL
Basic Materials
XLE
-
NOBL
Communication Services
XLE
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
NOBL
Financial Services
XLE
-
NOBL
Healthcare
XLE
-
NOBL
Industrials
XLE
-
NOBL
Real Estate
XLE
-
NOBL
Technology
XLE
-
NOBL
Utilities
XLE
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
NOBL
XLE vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.19 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.38 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 3.53 | +5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -35.43% | -35.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -9.11% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -15.36% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -17.92% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -35.43% | -31.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -2.43% | -5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -3.48% | -14.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 3.56% | +0.76% |
Volatility
XLE vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.95%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 2.95% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 8.11% | +8.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 11.52% | +9.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 14.41% | +11.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 16.61% | +12.97% |
XLE vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and NOBL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.94% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.35% for NOBL.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer