PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLE having a 35.03% return and FENY slightly higher at 35.12%. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed FENY with an annualized return of 10.52%, while FENY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.


XLE

1D
1.00%
1M
11.89%
6M
18.26%
YTD
35.03%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.87%

FENY

1D
1.04%
1M
11.58%
6M
18.35%
YTD
35.12%
1Y
43.91%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
5.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.95M$44.20M$53.46M
$1.70B$1.73B$1.97B

XLE vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
35.03%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
35.12%7.27%6.62%-0.04%62.94%55.62%-33.15%9.11%-19.99%-2.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and FENY is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.99

The correlation between XLE and FENY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLE vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
FENY

Energy

100.0%
99.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
FENY
99.6%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

FENY
0.3%

Communication Services

XLE

-

FENY

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

FENY

-

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

FENY

-

Financial Services

XLE

-

FENY

-

Healthcare

XLE

-

FENY

-

Industrials

XLE

-

FENY
0.1%

Real Estate

XLE

-

FENY

-

Technology

XLE

-

FENY

-

Utilities

XLE

-

FENY
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLE vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLEFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.76

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

7.45

-0.13

XLE vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FENY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and FENY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-74.35%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-14.96%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-21.47%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-26.64%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-69.07%

+2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-4.34%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-22.95%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

5.56%

+0.06%

Volatility

XLE vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) have volatilities of 5.85% and 5.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.96%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

16.62%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.05%

20.94%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.77%

26.20%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

29.78%

-0.21%

XLE vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than FENY's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.35%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.55%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XLE and FENY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FENY has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to XLE (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs FENY's -74.35%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.52% vs 9.96% for FENY. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FENY.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.35% for FENY.

XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.08% for FENY.

FENY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer