XLE vs. XOP
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from State Street - XLE tracks the Energy Select Sector Index while XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.19%/yr vs 2.96%/yr for XOP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.
Performance
XLE vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XLE having a 21.47% return and XOP slightly higher at 22.29%. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed XOP with an annualized return of 9.19%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- 21.47%
- 6M
- 22.40%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
XOP
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -10.57%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 6M
- 22.62%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
XLE vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 21.47% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 22.29% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and XOP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XLE and XOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLE vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
XOP
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLE
XOP
Basic Materials
XLE
-
XOP
Communication Services
XLE
-
XOP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
XOP
-
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
XOP
-
Financial Services
XLE
-
XOP
-
Healthcare
XLE
-
XOP
-
Industrials
XLE
-
XOP
-
Real Estate
XLE
-
XOP
-
Technology
XLE
-
XOP
-
Utilities
XLE
-
XOP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
XOP
XLE vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.21 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 3.34 | +2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -90.27% | +19.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -18.50% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -34.98% | +14.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -34.98% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -82.61% | +15.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.75% | -42.84% | +29.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.96% | -42.58% | +24.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 6.69% | -1.92% |
Volatility
XLE vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.16%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 8.96% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 22.01% | -5.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 28.09% | -7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 33.88% | -7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 40.25% | -10.65% |
XLE vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than XOP's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.83% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 2.12% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and XOP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOP has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to XLE (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs XOP's -90.27%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.19% vs 2.96% for XOP. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 2.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.12% for XOP.
XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.35% for XOP.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer