PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 39.22% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of -3.65%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.


XES

1D
-1.07%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
39.22%
6M
40.00%
1Y
79.49%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
-3.65%

SPYG

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
39.22%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and SPYG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between XES and SPYG has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XES vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
SPYG

Energy

97.1%
0.1%

Industrials

2.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Financial Services

-

9.0%

Healthcare

-

5.9%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

52.1%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Energy

XES
97.1%
SPYG
0.1%

Industrials

XES
2.9%
SPYG
5.4%

Basic Materials

XES

-

SPYG
0.3%

Communication Services

XES

-

SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

SPYG
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

SPYG
1.0%

Financial Services

XES

-

SPYG
9.0%

Healthcare

XES

-

SPYG
5.9%

Real Estate

XES

-

SPYG
0.6%

Technology

XES

-

SPYG
52.1%

Utilities

XES

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

1.96

+3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

7.79

+10.97

XES vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XES vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-67.63%

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.03%

-13.76%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-22.14%

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-32.67%

-13.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-32.67%

-58.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.11%

-5.52%

-67.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.40%

-24.28%

-30.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.46%

+0.79%

Volatility

XES vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.26%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.30%

7.26%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.80%

13.90%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.19%

17.26%

+13.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.02%

21.36%

+17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.96%

20.73%

+24.23%

XES vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.15%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and SPYG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to SPYG (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.05% vs -3.65% for XES. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.05% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.

XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.

XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.04% for SPYG.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer