XES vs. FENY
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY).
XES and FENY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XES is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. FENY is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Energy Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XES and FENY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XES or FENY.
Key characteristics
| XES | FENY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.58% | 15.64% |
| 1Y Return | 2.66% | 16.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 16.12% | 22.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.14% | 15.60% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -11.90% | 4.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.13 | 1.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.40 | 1.44 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.05 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.05 | 1.35 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.40 | 3.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.12% | 5.56% |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.82% | 18.11% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.65% | -74.35% |
| Current Drawdown | -80.22% | -1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and FENY is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XES vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 15.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed FENY with an annualized return of -11.90%, while FENY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.17% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XES vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XES vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XES vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FENY's 2.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.10% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.15% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% | 1.60% | 0.63% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.94% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% | 1.91% | 0.32% |
Drawdowns
XES vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than FENY's maximum drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and FENY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XES vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) at 6.06%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FENY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.