XES vs. PXJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ).

XES and PXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XES is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. PXJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. It was launched on Oct 26, 2005. Both XES and PXJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XES vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XES vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF	42.33%	5.89%	-5.44%	6.68%	62.03%	12.00%	-43.38%	-9.00%	-46.99%	-21.93%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	41.95%	8.74%	0.21%	14.44%	62.25%	11.28%	-44.31%	-0.32%	-39.82%	-23.08%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XES having a 42.33% return and PXJ slightly lower at 41.95%. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed PXJ with an annualized return of -2.35%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively higher -0.61% annualized return.

XES

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 42.33%
• 6M: 61.87%
• 1Y: 65.92%
• 3Y*: 17.22%
• 5Y*: 17.28%
• 10Y*: -2.35%

PXJ

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: 41.95%
• 6M: 54.34%
• 1Y: 66.96%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 21.74%
• 10Y*: -0.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

PXJ

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF

XES

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

Return for Risk

XES vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES

XES Risk / Return Rank: 81
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 82
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 73

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XES	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.94	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.38	-0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.36	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.75	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	9.91	-2.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XES vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and PXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XES	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	1.94	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.62	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	-0.02	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	-0.05	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XES and PXJ is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XES vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than PXJ's 2.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF	1.19%	1.69%	1.31%	0.66%	0.36%	1.81%	1.33%	1.43%	1.14%	1.68%	0.64%	2.47%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.27%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Drawdowns

XES vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XES	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.65%	-94.82%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.52%	-24.32%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.95%	-40.03%	-5.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.23%	-87.72%	-3.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.51%	-67.56%	-4.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.22%	-55.58%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.14%	6.75%	+2.39%

Volatility

XES vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) is 7.76%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that XES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XES	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.76%	8.38%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.14%	19.10%	+3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.03%	34.71%	+5.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.84%	35.21%	+4.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.20%	39.60%	+5.60%