PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. OIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 39.22% return, which is significantly higher than OIH's 35.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed OIH with an annualized return of -3.65%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively higher -2.32% annualized return.


XES

1D
-1.07%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
39.22%
6M
40.00%
1Y
79.49%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
-3.65%

OIH

1D
-1.13%
1M
-13.39%
YTD
35.03%
6M
35.52%
1Y
68.64%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
-2.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
39.22%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
35.03%6.81%-10.53%3.20%66.17%21.22%-41.19%-3.54%-45.03%-19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and OIH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.97

The correlation between XES and OIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

XES vs. OIH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
OIH

Energy

97.1%
97.6%

Industrials

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.9%

Energy

XES
97.1%
OIH
97.6%

Industrials

XES
2.9%
OIH

-

Basic Materials

XES

-

OIH

-

Communication Services

XES

-

OIH

-

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

OIH

-

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

OIH

-

Financial Services

XES

-

OIH

-

Healthcare

XES

-

OIH

-

Real Estate

XES

-

OIH

-

Technology

XES

-

OIH

-

Utilities

XES

-

OIH
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESOIHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

4.51

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.76

16.04

+2.72

XES vs. OIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the OIH Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and OIH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XES vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, roughly equal to the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and OIH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESOIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-94.45%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.03%

-15.29%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-43.80%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-43.80%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-89.62%

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.11%

-65.76%

-7.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.40%

-48.87%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

4.29%

-0.04%

Volatility

XES vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) have volatilities of 10.30% and 10.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESOIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.30%

10.14%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.80%

21.14%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.19%

30.39%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.02%

36.79%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.96%

42.38%

+2.58%

XES vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XES and OIH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

XES vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than OIH's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
1.27%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.15%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XES and OIH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XES has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to OIH (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs OIH's -94.45%.

On 10-year performance, OIH leads with -2.32% vs -3.65% for XES. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, OIH has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OIH has performed better with a -2.32% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES and OIH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.15% for XES.

XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and OIH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer