XES vs. OIH
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and OIH (VanEck Oil Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index while OIH tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -3.65%/yr vs -2.32%/yr for OIH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XES vs. OIH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 39.22% return, which is significantly higher than OIH's 35.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed OIH with an annualized return of -3.65%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively higher -2.32% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- 39.22%
- 6M
- 40.00%
- 1Y
- 79.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- -3.65%
OIH
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 6M
- 35.52%
- 1Y
- 68.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- -2.32%
XES vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 39.22% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 35.03% | 6.81% | -10.53% | 3.20% | 66.17% | 21.22% | -41.19% | -3.54% | -45.03% | -19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and OIH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XES and OIH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
XES vs. OIH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
OIH
Energy
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XES
OIH
Industrials
XES
OIH
-
Basic Materials
XES
-
OIH
-
Communication Services
XES
-
OIH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
OIH
-
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
OIH
-
Financial Services
XES
-
OIH
-
Healthcare
XES
-
OIH
-
Real Estate
XES
-
OIH
-
Technology
XES
-
OIH
-
Utilities
XES
-
OIH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank
XES
OIH
XES vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XES | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.32 | 4.51 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 16.04 | +2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XES vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, roughly equal to the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and OIH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -94.45% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -15.29% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -43.80% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -43.80% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -89.62% | -1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.11% | -65.76% | -7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.40% | -48.87% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 4.29% | -0.04% |
Volatility
XES vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) have volatilities of 10.30% and 10.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | OIH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.30% | 10.14% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.80% | 21.14% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.19% | 30.39% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 36.79% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 42.38% | +2.58% |
XES vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XES and OIH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XES vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than OIH's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OIH VanEck Oil Services ETF | 1.27% | 1.71% | 2.01% | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.98% | 1.23% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.60% | 1.40% | 2.39% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.15% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XES and OIH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XES has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to OIH (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs OIH's -94.45%.
On 10-year performance, OIH leads with -2.32% vs -3.65% for XES. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, OIH has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OIH has performed better with a -2.32% return vs -3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES and OIH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 1.15% for XES.
XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and OIH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer