PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 51.54% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 30.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of -2.41%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.


XES

1D
2.58%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
51.54%
6M
51.49%
1Y
106.77%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
-2.41%

XLE

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
30.48%
6M
30.54%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
20.29%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
51.54%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
30.48%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and XLE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.87

The correlation between XES and XLE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XES vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XES
XLE

Energy

97.5%
100.0%

Industrials

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XES
97.5%
XLE
100.0%

Industrials

XES
2.5%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

XES

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

XES

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XES

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

XES

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

XES

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

XES

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

XES

-

XLE

-

Technology

XES

-

XLE

-

Utilities

XES

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESXLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.52

2.20

+1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

2.83

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.35

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.21

3.88

+7.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.56

11.35

+19.20

XES vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

2.20

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.78

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.34

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.31

-0.38

Drawdowns

XES vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-71.26%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-12.05%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-20.14%

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-26.04%

-19.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-66.81%

-24.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.73%

-7.35%

-63.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.36%

-17.98%

-36.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

4.12%

-0.51%

Volatility

XES vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) have volatilities of 8.25% and 8.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

8.19%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

16.56%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.52%

20.53%

+9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

26.01%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.05%

29.59%

+15.46%

XES vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XLE's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.57%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and XLE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to XLE (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.08% vs -2.41% for XES. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.08% return vs -2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 1.12% for XES.

XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.08% for XLE.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer