XES vs. VDE
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index while VDE tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -3.54%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for VDE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XES charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
XES vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 40.73% return, which is significantly higher than VDE's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed VDE with an annualized return of -3.54%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.84% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -11.23%
- YTD
- 40.73%
- 6M
- 41.57%
- 1Y
- 73.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.23%
- 10Y*
- -3.54%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
XES vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 40.73% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 22.80% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and VDE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XES and VDE shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XES vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
VDE
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XES
VDE
Industrials
XES
VDE
Basic Materials
XES
-
VDE
Communication Services
XES
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
VDE
-
Financial Services
XES
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
XES
-
VDE
-
Real Estate
XES
-
VDE
-
Technology
XES
-
VDE
-
Utilities
XES
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
XES
VDE
XES vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XES | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 1.90 | +3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 5.92 | +11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XES vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -74.20% | -21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -14.20% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -21.41% | -24.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -26.58% | -19.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -69.29% | -21.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.82% | -13.11% | -59.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.39% | -19.94% | -34.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 4.57% | -0.35% |
Volatility
XES vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 7.02%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 7.02% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 16.69% | +4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.22% | 20.84% | +10.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.01% | 26.37% | +12.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.00% | 29.96% | +15.04% |
XES vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XES vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VDE's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.48% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and VDE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to VDE (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, VDE leads with 8.84% vs -3.54% for XES. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VDE has performed better with a 8.84% return vs -3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.48% for XES.
XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.09% for VDE.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer