VYM vs. MGV
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VYM returned 11.90%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MGV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VYM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
VYM vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 13.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 11.90%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
MGV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 26.98%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
VYM vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 13.14% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VYM and MGV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VYM and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
VYM vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VYM
MGV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
VYM
MGV
Technology
VYM
MGV
Healthcare
VYM
MGV
Industrials
VYM
MGV
Energy
VYM
MGV
Consumer Defensive
VYM
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
VYM
MGV
Utilities
VYM
MGV
Communication Services
VYM
MGV
Basic Materials
VYM
MGV
Real Estate
VYM
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VYM vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
VYM
MGV
VYM vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VYM | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.50 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 4.22 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.76 | 16.07 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VYM | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.76 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.88 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.79 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.48 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VYM vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, roughly equal to the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VYM | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.98% | -55.87% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.69% | -6.42% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -13.18% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -16.54% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.21% | -35.41% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | 0.00% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -7.70% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.68% | +0.10% |
Volatility
VYM vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.46%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VYM | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 2.46% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 7.46% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 9.83% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 13.56% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.33% | +0.01% |
VYM vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VYM vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than MGV's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VYM and MGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VYM has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to MGV (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs MGV's -55.87%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.82% vs 11.90% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGV.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.88% for MGV.
VYM is categorized as Dividend, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VYM and 0.05% for MGV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VYM and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer