VTWV vs. MGV
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV).
VTWV and MGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. MGV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Large Cap Value Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both VTWV and MGV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VTWV or MGV.
Key characteristics
| VTWV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.71% | 10.42% |
| 1Y Return | 25.39% | 24.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.85% | 8.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.00% | 11.76% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.30% | 10.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.13 | 2.33 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.62% | 9.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.73% | -56.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.90% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and MGV is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VTWV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 7.30%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VTWV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VTWV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than MGV's 2.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.42% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 2.34% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% | 2.26% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VTWV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.41%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.