VTWV vs. MGV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while MGV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.45%/yr vs 12.81%/yr for MGV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.

Performance

VTWV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than MGV's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 10.45%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.81% annualized return.

VTWV

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 6M: 20.33%
• 1Y: 45.38%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 6.95%
• 10Y*: 10.45%

MGV

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 13.05%
• 6M: 14.92%
• 1Y: 27.44%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 11.99%
• 10Y*: 12.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF	18.89%	12.72%	7.83%	14.67%	-14.46%	27.90%	4.88%	22.44%	-13.34%	8.06%
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	13.05%	15.45%	16.94%	9.16%	-1.22%	25.93%	2.50%	25.54%	-4.13%	16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and MGV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010	0.77

The correlation between VTWV and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTWV	MGV
Financial Services	23.9%	23.9%
Industrials	11.9%	13.7%
Real Estate	10.4%	1.2%
Healthcare	10.2%	16.6%
Technology	10.0%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	3.7%
Energy	8.9%	6.6%
Basic Materials	5.4%	2.4%
Utilities	5.2%	2.6%
Communication Services	2.7%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	11.9%

Return for Risk

VTWV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV

VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 79
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

MGV

MGV Risk / Return Rank: 84
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTWV	MGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	2.80	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.99	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.50	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.22	4.30	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.85	16.33	+1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTWV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the MGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and MGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTWV	MGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	2.80	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.89	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.79	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.48	+0.01

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and MGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTWV	MGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.73%	-55.87%	+10.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-6.42%	-2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.72%	-13.18%	-13.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.72%	-16.54%	-10.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.73%	-35.41%	-10.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	0.00%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-7.70%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	1.68%	+0.85%

Volatility

VTWV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) at 2.61%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTWV	MGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	2.61%	+2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	7.50%	+4.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.12%	9.83%	+8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.71%	13.56%	+8.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	16.34%	+7.20%

VTWV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTWV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than MGV's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF	1.89%	2.04%	2.31%	2.48%	2.45%	2.17%	2.47%	2.69%	2.65%	2.34%	2.53%	2.59%
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.56%	1.79%	1.78%	2.02%	2.07%	1.60%	1.49%	1.82%	2.04%	1.63%	1.57%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTWV and MGV in my portfolio?

VTWV and MGV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTWV or MGV?

VTWV has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to MGV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs MGV's -55.87%.

Which ETF is better, VTWV or MGV?

On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 12.81% vs 10.45% for VTWV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTWV or MGV?

Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTWV or MGV?

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTWV or MGV?

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.

What is the main difference between VTWV and MGV?

VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.05% for MGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.