PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 12.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWV having a 10.45% annualized return and VBR not far ahead at 10.58%.


VTWV

1D
0.95%
1M
3.21%
YTD
18.89%
6M
20.33%
1Y
45.38%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
10.45%

VBR

1D
0.86%
1M
1.86%
YTD
12.11%
6M
13.63%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
18.89%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
12.11%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VBR is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between VTWV and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
VBR

Financial Services

23.9%
17.6%

Industrials

11.9%
18.1%

Real Estate

10.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
7.9%

Technology

10.0%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
12.4%

Energy

8.9%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%
6.3%

Utilities

5.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.0%

Financial Services

VTWV
23.9%
VBR
17.6%

Industrials

VTWV
11.9%
VBR
18.1%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.4%
VBR
10.1%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.2%
VBR
7.9%

Technology

VTWV
10.0%
VBR
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
9.2%
VBR
12.4%

Energy

VTWV
8.9%
VBR
5.2%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
VBR
6.3%

Utilities

VTWV
5.2%
VBR
4.8%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
VBR
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.2%
VBR
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWVVBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

1.84

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

2.70

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

3.10

+2.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.85

10.94

+6.91

VTWV vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWVVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.84

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.41

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.42

+0.07

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-61.98%

+16.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-8.85%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-24.19%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-24.19%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-45.28%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-8.27%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.50%

+0.03%

Volatility

VTWV vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 4.07%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

4.07%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

10.46%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.12%

15.17%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

19.77%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

21.74%

+1.80%

VTWV vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWV vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than VBR's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.75%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.56%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VTWV and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to VBR (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.58% vs 10.45% for VTWV. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.56% for VTWV.

VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.05% for VBR.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer