VTWV vs. VTWO
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.45%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for VTWO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
VTWV vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTWV having a 18.89% return and VTWO slightly lower at 18.72%. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VTWO with an annualized return of 10.45%, while VTWO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 18.89%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 45.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
VTWO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
VTWV vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 18.89% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 18.72% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and VTWO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VTWV and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
VTWO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
VTWO
Industrials
VTWV
VTWO
Real Estate
VTWV
VTWO
Healthcare
VTWV
VTWO
Technology
VTWV
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
VTWO
Energy
VTWV
VTWO
Basic Materials
VTWV
VTWO
Utilities
VTWV
VTWO
Communication Services
VTWV
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
VTWO
VTWV vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.30 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 3.14 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.22 | 3.99 | +1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.85 | 14.22 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.30 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.30 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.49 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -41.19% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -10.99% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -27.57% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -31.88% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | -41.19% | -4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.12% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -8.39% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.08% | -0.55% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is 4.98%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that VTWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 5.55% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 13.49% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 19.06% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 22.47% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 23.08% | +0.46% |
VTWV vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VTWV and VTWO have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWV vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than VTWO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VTWV and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to VTWV (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 11.23% vs 10.45% for VTWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV and VTWO have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.07% for VTWO.
VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VTWO is Small Cap Blend Equities. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer