PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 22.89% return, which is significantly higher than VTWO's 18.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWV having a 10.42% annualized return and VTWO not far ahead at 10.85%.


VTWV

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.07%
6M
15.09%
YTD
22.89%
1Y
43.58%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
10.75%

VTWO

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.08%
6M
12.79%
YTD
18.91%
1Y
37.17%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
10.85%
ALL TIME*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$175.65M$196.25M$231.49M
$6.82M$6.63M$5.67M

VTWV vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
22.89%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
18.91%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VTWO is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.92

The correlation between VTWV and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
VTWO

Financial Services

27.6%
17.6%

Industrials

12.0%
14.1%

Real Estate

11.3%
6.7%

Healthcare

10.9%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.2%

Technology

7.3%
14.8%

Energy

5.6%
5.4%

Utilities

5.1%
2.7%

Basic Materials

4.2%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.2%

Financial Services

VTWV
27.6%
VTWO
17.6%

Industrials

VTWV
12.0%
VTWO
14.1%

Real Estate

VTWV
11.3%
VTWO
6.7%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.9%
VTWO
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
10.1%
VTWO
9.2%

Technology

VTWV
7.3%
VTWO
14.8%

Energy

VTWV
5.6%
VTWO
5.4%

Utilities

VTWV
5.1%
VTWO
2.7%

Basic Materials

VTWV
4.2%
VTWO
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
3.2%
VTWO
2.6%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.5%
VTWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTWV vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWVVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

3.14

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.24

11.17

+6.07

VTWV vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-41.19%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-10.99%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-27.57%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-31.88%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

-41.19%

-4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-3.04%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-8.32%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.09%

-0.72%

Volatility

VTWV vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is 3.31%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that VTWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.79%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

14.10%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

19.35%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

22.43%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

23.06%

+0.42%

VTWV vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VTWV and VTWO have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWV vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than VTWO's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.11%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.60%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VTWV and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VTWV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs VTWO's -41.19%.

On 10-year performance, VTWO leads with 10.85% vs 10.42% for VTWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV and VTWO have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.11% for VTWO.

VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VTWO is Small Cap Blend Equities. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer