PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VTWV vs. VONG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and VONG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

VTWV vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.37%
14.75%
VTWV
VONG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VTWV:

0.54

VONG:

1.57

Sortino Ratio

VTWV:

0.92

VONG:

2.10

Omega Ratio

VTWV:

1.11

VONG:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

VTWV:

0.86

VONG:

2.11

Martin Ratio

VTWV:

2.28

VONG:

7.98

Ulcer Index

VTWV:

4.75%

VONG:

3.47%

Daily Std Dev

VTWV:

19.97%

VONG:

17.67%

Max Drawdown

VTWV:

-45.73%

VONG:

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

VTWV:

-7.38%

VONG:

-0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 7.27%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.57% annualized return.


VTWV

YTD

1.85%

1M

0.08%

6M

3.60%

1Y

13.44%

5Y*

8.20%

10Y*

7.27%

VONG

YTD

3.71%

1M

2.30%

6M

13.04%

1Y

29.92%

5Y*

18.24%

10Y*

16.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VTWV vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
Expense ratio chart for VTWV: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for VONG: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VTWV vs. VONG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VTWV is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VTWV is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VTWV is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VTWV is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VTWV is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VTWV is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VONG is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VONG is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VONG is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VONG is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VONG is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VONG is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VTWV vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VTWV, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.541.57
The chart of Sortino ratio for VTWV, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.922.10
The chart of Omega ratio for VTWV, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.111.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for VTWV, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.862.11
The chart of Martin ratio for VTWV, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.287.98
VTWV
VONG

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.54
1.57
VTWV
VONG

Dividends

VTWV vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VONG's 0.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.75%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%1.71%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.53%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%1.43%

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and VONG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.38%
-0.51%
VTWV
VONG

Volatility

VTWV vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) is 4.13%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that VTWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.13%
4.91%
VTWV
VONG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab