VOE vs. IMCV
VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) and IMCV (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - VOE tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index while IMCV tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOE returned 10.55%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for IMCV. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VOE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCV.
Performance
VOE vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than IMCV's 9.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOE having a 10.55% annualized return and IMCV not far behind at 10.40%.
VOE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
IMCV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 11.32%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
VOE vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 10.75% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 9.96% | 13.52% | 12.28% | 11.89% | -6.98% | 33.56% | -4.11% | 24.72% | -10.93% | 12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOE and IMCV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VOE and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOE vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOE
IMCV
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
VOE
IMCV
Industrials
VOE
IMCV
Energy
VOE
IMCV
Utilities
VOE
IMCV
Technology
VOE
IMCV
Consumer Defensive
VOE
IMCV
Healthcare
VOE
IMCV
Real Estate
VOE
IMCV
Basic Materials
VOE
IMCV
Consumer Cyclical
VOE
IMCV
Communication Services
VOE
IMCV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOE vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank
VOE
IMCV
VOE vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VOE | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.41 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.51 | 12.72 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VOE | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.02 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.47 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
VOE vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and IMCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOE | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.50% | -64.74% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -6.90% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -18.63% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | -19.87% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.18% | -46.33% | +3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.21% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -8.42% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.85% | -0.03% |
Volatility
VOE vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOE | IMCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 2.56% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 8.00% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 11.63% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 16.63% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 19.66% | -0.83% |
VOE vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOE vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison
VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than IMCV's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCV iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.94% | 2.23% | 2.36% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 1.86% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.61% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.29% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VOE and IMCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOE has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to IMCV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs IMCV's -64.74%.
On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.55% vs 10.40% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOE.
IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.88% for VOE.
VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOE and 0.06% for IMCV.
IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOE and IMCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer