PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. IMCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. IMCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly higher than IMCV's 9.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOE having a 10.55% annualized return and IMCV not far behind at 10.40%.


VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%

IMCV

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.96%
6M
11.32%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. IMCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
9.96%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and IMCV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.95

The correlation between VOE and IMCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOE vs. IMCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
IMCV

Financial Services

16.5%
15.6%

Industrials

14.0%
12.1%

Energy

12.8%
12.5%

Utilities

12.1%
10.0%

Technology

10.9%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
8.9%

Healthcare

6.3%
8.5%

Real Estate

6.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
8.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

VOE
16.5%
IMCV
15.6%

Industrials

VOE
14.0%
IMCV
12.1%

Energy

VOE
12.8%
IMCV
12.5%

Utilities

VOE
12.1%
IMCV
10.0%

Technology

VOE
10.9%
IMCV
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.9%
IMCV
8.9%

Healthcare

VOE
6.3%
IMCV
8.5%

Real Estate

VOE
6.0%
IMCV
5.6%

Basic Materials

VOE
5.8%
IMCV
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
5.7%
IMCV
8.7%

Communication Services

VOE
2.2%
IMCV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. IMCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. IMCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOEIMCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.41

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.51

12.72

-0.21

VOE vs. IMCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the IMCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and IMCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOEIMCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.02

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.53

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.47

-0.03

Drawdowns

VOE vs. IMCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, smaller than the maximum IMCV drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and IMCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEIMCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-64.74%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-6.90%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-18.63%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-19.87%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-46.33%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.21%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-8.42%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.85%

-0.03%

Volatility

VOE vs. IMCV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEIMCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.56%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

8.00%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

11.63%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

16.63%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

19.66%

-0.83%

VOE vs. IMCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. IMCV - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than IMCV's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.94%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VOE and IMCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOE has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to IMCV (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs IMCV's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.55% vs 10.40% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOE.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.88% for VOE.

VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOE and 0.06% for IMCV.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and IMCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer