VOE vs. VOT
VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOE returned 10.60%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for VOT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
VOE vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 10.60%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.
VOE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
VOT
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
VOE vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 11.03% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.90% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOE and VOT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VOE and VOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOE vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOE
VOT
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
VOE
VOT
Industrials
VOE
VOT
Energy
VOE
VOT
Utilities
VOE
VOT
Technology
VOE
VOT
Consumer Defensive
VOE
VOT
Healthcare
VOE
VOT
Real Estate
VOE
VOT
Basic Materials
VOE
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
VOE
VOT
Communication Services
VOE
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOE vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
VOE
VOT
VOE vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOE | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 0.84 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 2.49 | +10.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOE vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOE | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.50% | -60.16% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -15.96% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -21.77% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | -37.19% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.18% | -37.19% | -5.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | 0.00% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -9.95% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 5.35% | -3.52% |
Volatility
VOE vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 3.39%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOE | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 6.83% | -3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 13.60% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 16.80% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 21.51% | -5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 21.06% | -2.22% |
VOE vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VOE and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOE vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOE and VOT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOT has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to VOE (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs VOT's -60.16%.
On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.41% vs 10.60% for VOE. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE and VOT have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.60% for VOT.
VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOE and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer