PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 9.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 10.60%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.


VOE

1D
0.02%
1M
2.46%
YTD
11.03%
6M
11.11%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
10.60%

VOT

1D
1.65%
1M
8.71%
YTD
9.90%
6M
9.37%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOE vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
11.03%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
9.90%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and VOT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.85

The correlation between VOE and VOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VOE vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
VOT

Financial Services

16.5%
6.8%

Industrials

14.0%
23.7%

Energy

12.8%
2.7%

Utilities

12.1%
3.5%

Technology

10.9%
28.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
0.8%

Healthcare

6.3%
9.3%

Real Estate

6.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

5.8%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
13.9%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.8%

Financial Services

VOE
16.5%
VOT
6.8%

Industrials

VOE
14.0%
VOT
23.7%

Energy

VOE
12.8%
VOT
2.7%

Utilities

VOE
12.1%
VOT
3.5%

Technology

VOE
10.9%
VOT
28.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.9%
VOT
0.8%

Healthcare

VOE
6.3%
VOT
9.3%

Real Estate

VOE
6.0%
VOT
4.8%

Basic Materials

VOE
5.8%
VOT
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
5.7%
VOT
13.9%

Communication Services

VOE
2.2%
VOT
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOEVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.14

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.84

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

2.49

+10.51

VOE vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOE vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-60.16%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-15.96%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-21.77%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-37.19%

+17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-37.19%

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

0.00%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-9.95%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

5.35%

-3.52%

Volatility

VOE vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 3.39%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

6.83%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

13.60%

-5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

16.80%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

21.51%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

21.06%

-2.22%

VOE vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOE and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.60%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOE and VOT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to VOE (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, VOT leads with 12.41% vs 10.60% for VOE. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOT has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE and VOT have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.60% for VOT.

VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer