VOE vs. IJJ
VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) and IJJ (iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - VOE tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index while IJJ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOE returned 10.60%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for IJJ. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VOE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IJJ.
Performance
VOE vs. IJJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOE having a 11.03% return and IJJ slightly lower at 10.80%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOE having a 10.60% annualized return and IJJ not far behind at 10.49%.
VOE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
IJJ
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 21.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
VOE vs. IJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 11.03% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 10.80% | 7.27% | 11.63% | 15.24% | -7.11% | 30.45% | 3.56% | 25.66% | -12.06% | 12.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOE and IJJ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VOE and IJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOE vs. IJJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOE
IJJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
VOE
IJJ
Industrials
VOE
IJJ
Energy
VOE
IJJ
Utilities
VOE
IJJ
Technology
VOE
IJJ
Consumer Defensive
VOE
IJJ
Healthcare
VOE
IJJ
Real Estate
VOE
IJJ
Basic Materials
VOE
IJJ
Consumer Cyclical
VOE
IJJ
Communication Services
VOE
IJJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOE vs. IJJ — Risk / Return Rank
VOE
IJJ
VOE vs. IJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOE | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 2.08 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 7.20 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOE vs. IJJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than IJJ's maximum drawdown of -58.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and IJJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOE | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.50% | -58.00% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -10.59% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -22.68% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | -22.68% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.18% | -46.11% | +2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -0.99% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -7.92% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 3.06% | -1.23% |
Volatility
VOE vs. IJJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 3.39%, while iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOE | IJJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 4.17% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 10.83% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 15.43% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 19.55% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 22.05% | -3.21% |
VOE vs. IJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IJJ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOE vs. IJJ - Dividend Comparison
VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than IJJ's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJJ iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.62% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.70% | 2.01% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.83% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VOE and IJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJJ has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to VOE (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs IJJ's -58.00%.
On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.60% vs 10.49% for IJJ. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJJ.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.62% for IJJ.
VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while IJJ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOE and 0.18% for IJJ.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOE and IJJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer