PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOE vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.84%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.


VOE

1D
0.97%
1M
4.20%
6M
12.76%
YTD
18.15%
1Y
24.96%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
10.84%
ALL TIME*
9.63%

VOO

1D
0.24%
1M
1.60%
6M
7.10%
YTD
9.24%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
14.96%
ALL TIME*
14.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$52.86M$56.10M$54.27M
$3.35B$3.87B$5.41B

VOE vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
18.15%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.24%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VOE and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between VOE and VOO has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOE vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOE
VOO

Financial Services

18.7%
11.4%

Industrials

14.6%
8.5%

Utilities

12.6%
2.2%

Energy

11.7%
3.0%

Technology

8.1%
38.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.5%

Healthcare

7.2%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
9.5%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.7%

Real Estate

5.8%
1.8%

Communication Services

1.5%
9.9%

Financial Services

VOE
18.7%
VOO
11.4%

Industrials

VOE
14.6%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

VOE
12.6%
VOO
2.2%

Energy

VOE
11.7%
VOO
3.0%

Technology

VOE
8.1%
VOO
38.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOE
7.6%
VOO
4.5%

Healthcare

VOE
7.2%
VOO
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VOE
5.9%
VOO
9.5%

Basic Materials

VOE
5.9%
VOO
1.7%

Real Estate

VOE
5.8%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

VOE
1.5%
VOO
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOE vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOEVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.00

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.94

8.58

+5.36

VOE vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOE and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOEVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.50%

-33.99%

-27.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-8.90%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-18.69%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-24.52%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

-33.99%

-9.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.19%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-3.67%

-4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.07%

-0.27%

Volatility

VOE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 2.59%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOEVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.17%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

9.83%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

12.61%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

16.91%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

18.01%

+0.73%

VOE vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than VOO's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.79%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOE and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to VOE (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 14.96% vs 10.84% for VOE. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VOE.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.08% for VOO.

VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOE and 0.03% for VOO.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOE and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer