PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMCV vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IMCV vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IMCV achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 20.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IMCV has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 10.97%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 23.84% annualized return.


IMCV

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.38%
6M
13.07%
YTD
17.00%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
10.97%
ALL TIME*
9.92%

FTEC

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.38%
6M
21.39%
YTD
20.47%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
26.88%
5Y*
18.05%
10Y*
23.84%
ALL TIME*
21.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$82.97M$78.72M$94.67M
$2.44M$2.33M$2.03M

IMCV vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
17.00%13.52%12.28%11.89%-6.98%33.56%-4.11%24.72%-10.93%12.60%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
20.47%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IMCV and FTEC is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between IMCV and FTEC has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IMCV vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IMCV
FTEC

Financial Services

17.7%
0.5%

Industrials

11.6%
0.3%

Energy

11.4%
0.3%

Healthcare

10.3%

-

Utilities

10.1%

-

Technology

9.3%
98.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.4%
0.5%

Financial Services

IMCV
17.7%
FTEC
0.5%

Industrials

IMCV
11.6%
FTEC
0.3%

Energy

IMCV
11.4%
FTEC
0.3%

Healthcare

IMCV
10.3%
FTEC

-

Utilities

IMCV
10.1%
FTEC

-

Technology

IMCV
9.3%
FTEC
98.6%

Consumer Defensive

IMCV
8.6%
FTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

IMCV
8.4%
FTEC
0.1%

Real Estate

IMCV
5.5%
FTEC

-

Basic Materials

IMCV
4.8%
FTEC
0.0%

Communication Services

IMCV
2.4%
FTEC
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IMCV vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IMCV
IMCV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IMCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IMCV vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IMCVFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.97

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

5.31

+9.41

IMCV vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCV and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IMCV vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCV drawdown since its inception was -64.74%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCV and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IMCVFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.74%

-34.95%

-29.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-16.26%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.63%

-27.30%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-34.95%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.33%

-34.95%

-11.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-10.03%

+8.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-5.59%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

6.02%

-4.22%

Volatility

IMCV vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCV) is 3.23%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that IMCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IMCVFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

8.49%

-5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

20.19%

-12.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

24.35%

-12.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

25.87%

-9.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.55%

24.98%

-5.43%

IMCV vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMCV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IMCV vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

IMCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than FTEC's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.37%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
IMCV
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.81%2.23%2.36%2.30%2.36%1.86%2.61%2.45%2.61%1.87%2.09%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IMCV and FTEC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to IMCV (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMCV dropped -64.74% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 23.84% vs 10.97% for IMCV. On fees, IMCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FTEC.

IMCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.37% for FTEC.

IMCV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. IMCV tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Value Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IMCV and 0.08% for FTEC.

IMCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IMCV and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer