PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VO having a 11.55% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 11.90%.


VO

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.20%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.55%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.05%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and VYM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.88

The correlation between VO and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VO vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VO
VYM

Technology

18.6%
17.7%

Industrials

17.9%
12.1%

Financial Services

12.8%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
6.7%

Energy

8.5%
9.8%

Utilities

8.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

7.6%
12.2%

Real Estate

5.4%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
8.1%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.1%
3.5%

Technology

VO
18.6%
VYM
17.7%

Industrials

VO
17.9%
VYM
12.1%

Financial Services

VO
12.8%
VYM
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VO
8.6%
VYM
6.7%

Energy

VO
8.5%
VYM
9.8%

Utilities

VO
8.3%
VYM
5.7%

Healthcare

VO
7.6%
VYM
12.2%

Real Estate

VO
5.4%
VYM
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VO
4.8%
VYM
8.1%

Basic Materials

VO
4.2%
VYM
3.5%

Communication Services

VO
3.1%
VYM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VOVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.93

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

14.76

-6.26

VO vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VOVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.56

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.73

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.51

-0.01

Drawdowns

VO vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-56.98%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-6.69%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-14.46%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-15.84%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-35.21%

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.43%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-7.19%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.78%

+0.36%

Volatility

VO vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.77%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

7.67%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

10.28%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

13.96%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

16.34%

+2.61%

VO vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and VYM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 11.55% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VYM.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer