VO vs. SCHM
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM).
VO and SCHM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. SCHM is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. It was launched on Jan 13, 2011. Both VO and SCHM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VO or SCHM.
Correlation
The correlation between VO and SCHM is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VO vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VO:
1.84
SCHM:
1.42
VO:
2.50
SCHM:
1.97
VO:
1.32
SCHM:
1.25
VO:
2.35
SCHM:
2.59
VO:
8.76
SCHM:
6.30
VO:
2.64%
SCHM:
3.36%
VO:
12.56%
SCHM:
14.91%
VO:
-58.88%
SCHM:
-42.43%
VO:
-3.40%
SCHM:
-3.80%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 10.19%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.
VO
3.67%
4.03%
11.22%
22.41%
10.04%
10.19%
SCHM
4.01%
4.34%
9.40%
20.30%
10.45%
11.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VO vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VO and SCHM have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VO vs. SCHM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VO
SCHM
VO vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VO vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than SCHM's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.79% | 1.85% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% | 1.29% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.97% | 2.05% | 3.03% | 3.62% | 2.52% | 2.68% | 2.51% | 4.13% | 2.28% | 2.12% | 3.19% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
VO vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SCHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VO vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.