VO vs. VOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT).
VO and VOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006. Both VO and VOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VO or VOT.
Correlation
The correlation between VO and VOT is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VO vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VO:
1.34
VOT:
1.24
VO:
1.86
VOT:
1.71
VO:
1.24
VOT:
1.22
VO:
1.63
VOT:
0.99
VO:
7.86
VOT:
7.24
VO:
2.15%
VOT:
2.58%
VO:
12.61%
VOT:
15.12%
VO:
-58.89%
VOT:
-60.17%
VO:
-7.15%
VOT:
-6.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 17.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 9.58%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
VO
15.33%
-3.45%
9.49%
15.89%
9.97%
9.58%
VOT
17.05%
-1.21%
10.73%
17.75%
10.78%
10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VO vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VO vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VO vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VOT's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.88% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% | 1.29% | 1.18% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
VO vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and VOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VO vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.43%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.