VO vs. IJH
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.71%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for IJH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
VO vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 14.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VO having a 11.71% annualized return and IJH not far behind at 11.42%.
VO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 18.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
IJH
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 26.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
VO vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.04% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.16% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and IJH is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VO and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VO vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
IJH
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
VO
IJH
Industrials
VO
IJH
Financial Services
VO
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
VO
IJH
Energy
VO
IJH
Utilities
VO
IJH
Healthcare
VO
IJH
Real Estate
VO
IJH
Consumer Defensive
VO
IJH
Basic Materials
VO
IJH
Communication Services
VO
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
VO
IJH
VO vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.97 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 10.86 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than IJH's maximum drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -55.07% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.83% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -24.10% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -24.10% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -42.18% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -1.55% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -7.56% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.41% | -0.25% |
Volatility
VO vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.48%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 4.96% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 11.70% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 15.84% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 19.79% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 21.20% | -2.22% |
VO vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VO and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJH has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VO (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.71% vs 11.42% for IJH. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.18% for IJH.
VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer