VO vs. VXF
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds from Vanguard - VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index while VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.71%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for VXF. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXF.
Performance
VO vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 13.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VO having a 11.71% annualized return and VXF not far ahead at 12.27%.
VO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.21%
- 1Y
- 18.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
VXF
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
VO vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.04% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 13.87% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -26.52% | 12.31% | 32.45% | 27.96% | -9.34% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and VXF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VO and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VO vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
VXF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
VO
VXF
Industrials
VO
VXF
Financial Services
VO
VXF
Consumer Cyclical
VO
VXF
Energy
VO
VXF
Utilities
VO
VXF
Healthcare
VO
VXF
Real Estate
VO
VXF
Consumer Defensive
VO
VXF
Basic Materials
VO
VXF
Communication Services
VO
VXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
VO
VXF
VO vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.86 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 10.08 | -1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -58.03% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -10.21% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -26.92% | +7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -36.39% | +8.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -41.72% | +2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -1.63% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -9.54% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.90% | -0.74% |
Volatility
VO vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.48%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 6.35% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 13.21% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 17.78% | -5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 22.43% | -4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 22.34% | -3.36% |
VO vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VXF's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VO and VXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXF has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to VO (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs VXF's -58.03%.
On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 12.27% vs 11.71% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VXF.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.02% for VXF.
VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.05% for VXF.
VXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer