PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. FFSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 24.91% return, which is significantly higher than FFSM's 21.43% return.


VIOG

1D
1.77%
1M
0.05%
6M
17.89%
YTD
24.91%
1Y
34.56%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
12.94%

FFSM

1D
1.20%
1M
-0.08%
6M
14.38%
YTD
21.43%
1Y
37.13%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.20M$10.45M$7.00M
$3.70M$4.45M$4.82M

VIOG vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
24.91%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%12.22%
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
21.43%14.89%14.38%17.30%-16.35%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and FFSM is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021

0.94

The correlation between VIOG and FFSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. FFSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
FFSM

Industrials

19.5%
21.9%

Technology

17.6%
19.9%

Healthcare

16.9%
9.8%

Financial Services

13.7%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
11.3%

Real Estate

6.8%
5.0%

Energy

3.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
6.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
0.6%

Utilities

1.6%
2.3%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
FFSM
21.9%

Technology

VIOG
17.6%
FFSM
19.9%

Healthcare

VIOG
16.9%
FFSM
9.8%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
FFSM
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
11.0%
FFSM
11.3%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.8%
FFSM
5.0%

Energy

VIOG
3.8%
FFSM
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.4%
FFSM
4.3%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
FFSM
6.9%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.4%
FFSM
0.6%

Utilities

VIOG
1.6%
FFSM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSM
FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIOG vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOGFFSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.60

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

13.42

-0.58

VIOG vs. FFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FFSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and FFSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, which is greater than FFSM's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and FFSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGFFSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-26.65%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-10.37%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-24.78%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-26.65%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-2.70%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-7.69%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.77%

-0.07%

Volatility

VIOG vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGFFSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

4.27%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

14.76%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

18.88%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

20.74%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

20.53%

+2.31%

VIOG vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOG vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than FFSM's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.44%0.56%0.62%0.56%0.58%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.75%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIOG and FFSM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIOG has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to FFSM (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs FFSM's -26.65%.

On 5-year performance, FFSM leads with 10.93% vs 7.08% for VIOG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FFSM has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.44% for FFSM.

VIOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FFSM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.43% for FFSM.

FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and FFSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer