PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. FFSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than FFSM's 18.92% return.


VIOG

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.86%
YTD
15.37%
6M
13.49%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
10.83%

FFSM

1D
0.16%
1M
3.08%
YTD
18.92%
6M
18.95%
1Y
38.60%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
15.37%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%10.55%
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
18.92%14.89%14.38%17.30%-16.35%19.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and FFSM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.95

The correlation between VIOG and FFSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. FFSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
FFSM

Technology

19.7%
14.0%

Industrials

19.5%
29.5%

Healthcare

14.6%
9.1%

Financial Services

13.7%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
12.2%

Real Estate

6.6%
0.0%

Energy

4.1%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
6.2%

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Utilities

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
FFSM
14.0%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
FFSM
29.5%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
FFSM
9.1%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
FFSM
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
FFSM
12.2%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
FFSM
0.0%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
FFSM
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
FFSM
2.3%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
FFSM
6.2%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
FFSM

-

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
FFSM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSM
FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOGFFSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.74

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

15.16

-5.15

VIOG vs. FFSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FFSM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and FFSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOGFFSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.16

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.50

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.59

0.00

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, which is greater than FFSM's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and FFSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGFFSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-26.65%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-10.37%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-24.78%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-26.65%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.57%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-7.86%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.55%

+0.09%

Volatility

VIOG vs. FFSM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) is 4.61%, while Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that VIOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGFFSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

5.70%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

13.98%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

17.96%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

20.66%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

20.57%

+2.27%

VIOG vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOG vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than FFSM's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.46%0.56%0.62%0.56%0.58%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.84%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VIOG and FFSM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSM has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to VIOG (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs FFSM's -26.65%.

On 5-year performance, FFSM leads with 10.37% vs 5.47% for VIOG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 10.37% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.46% for FFSM.

VIOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FFSM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.43% for FFSM.

FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and FFSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer