PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFSM vs. FFLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and FFLC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FFSM vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.50%
8.37%
FFSM
FFLC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFSM:

0.94

FFLC:

2.36

Sortino Ratio

FFSM:

1.41

FFLC:

3.18

Omega Ratio

FFSM:

1.17

FFLC:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

FFSM:

1.71

FFLC:

3.53

Martin Ratio

FFSM:

5.01

FFLC:

16.09

Ulcer Index

FFSM:

3.14%

FFLC:

1.96%

Daily Std Dev

FFSM:

16.72%

FFLC:

13.40%

Max Drawdown

FFSM:

-26.65%

FFLC:

-15.86%

Current Drawdown

FFSM:

-7.73%

FFLC:

-1.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than FFLC's 31.01% return.


FFSM

YTD

15.60%

1M

-6.30%

6M

8.41%

1Y

15.74%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFLC

YTD

31.01%

1M

-0.27%

6M

8.32%

1Y

31.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFSM vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for FFSM: current value at 0.43% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.43%
Expense ratio chart for FFLC: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFSM vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.942.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.413.18
The chart of Omega ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.171.43
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.713.53
The chart of Martin ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 5.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.0116.09
FFSM
FFLC

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and FFLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.94
2.36
FFSM
FFLC

Dividends

FFSM vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than FFLC's 0.80% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.61%0.56%0.58%0.37%0.00%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.80%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -15.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-7.73%
-1.79%
FFSM
FFLC

Volatility

FFSM vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 3.86%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.76%
3.86%
FFSM
FFLC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab