FFSM vs. FFLV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) and FFLV (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FFLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFSM returned 35.51% vs 32.84% for FFLV. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFSM charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLV.

Performance

FFSM vs. FFLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 19.99% return, which is significantly higher than FFLV's 18.24% return.

FFSM

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 14.51%
• YTD: 19.99%
• 1Y: 35.51%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.02%

FFLV

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 2.75%
• 6M: 13.65%
• YTD: 18.24%
• 1Y: 32.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	$189.23K	$127.14K	$97.53K
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	$10.97M	$10.32M	$6.89M

FFSM vs. FFLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	19.99%	14.89%	9.25%
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	18.24%	16.04%	-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and FFLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2024	0.82

The correlation between FFSM and FFLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFSM vs. FFLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 81
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FFLV

FFLV Risk / Return Rank: 94
FFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFSM vs. FFLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFSM	FFLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.80	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	3.98	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.50	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	4.38	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	17.62	-5.44

FFSM vs. FFLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the FFLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and FFLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. FFLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, which is greater than FFLV's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and FFLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSM	FFLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.65%	-16.71%	-9.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-7.24%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.85%	0.00%	-3.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-3.38%	-4.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	1.80%	+0.97%

Volatility

FFSM vs. FFLV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) at 2.85%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSM	FFLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	2.85%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.82%	8.33%	+6.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.90%	11.42%	+7.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.73%	14.94%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.53%	14.94%	+5.59%

FFSM vs. FFLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLV's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFSM vs. FFLV - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than FFLV's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	1.36%	1.60%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.44%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSM and FFLV in my portfolio?

FFSM and FFLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFSM or FFLV?

FFSM has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FFLV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs FFLV's -16.71%.

Which ETF is better, FFSM or FFLV?

On 1-year performance, FFSM leads with 35.51% vs 32.84% for FFLV. On fees, FFLV is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FFLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFSM or FFLV?

Over the 1-year period, FFSM has performed better with a 35.51% return vs 32.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFSM or FFLV?

FFLV is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFSM or FFLV?

FFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.44% for FFSM.

What is the main difference between FFSM and FFLV?

FFSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FFLV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FFSM and 0.38% for FFLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.