PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSM vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSM vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFSM having a 18.72% return and AVUV slightly higher at 19.12%.


FFSM

1D
1.65%
1M
2.13%
YTD
18.72%
6M
20.25%
1Y
40.12%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
0.92%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.12%
6M
20.66%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSM vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
18.72%14.89%14.38%17.30%-16.35%19.77%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.12%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%26.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSM and AVUV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.91

The correlation between FFSM and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FFSM vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFSM
AVUV

Industrials

29.5%
13.9%

Financial Services

22.7%
25.8%

Technology

14.0%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
18.0%

Healthcare

9.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

6.2%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.5%

Energy

2.2%
18.2%

Utilities

1.8%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.7%

Communication Services

-

2.8%

Industrials

FFSM
29.5%
AVUV
13.9%

Financial Services

FFSM
22.7%
AVUV
25.8%

Technology

FFSM
14.0%
AVUV
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FFSM
12.2%
AVUV
18.0%

Healthcare

FFSM
9.1%
AVUV
4.2%

Basic Materials

FFSM
6.2%
AVUV
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

FFSM
2.3%
AVUV
4.5%

Energy

FFSM
2.2%
AVUV
18.2%

Utilities

FFSM
1.8%
AVUV
0.1%

Real Estate

FFSM
0.0%
AVUV
0.7%

Communication Services

FFSM

-

AVUV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSM vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSM
FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSM vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSMAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.29

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

3.26

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

4.99

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.60

14.84

+0.76

FFSM vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFSMAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.29

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.56

+0.02

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSMAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-49.42%

+22.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-7.95%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-28.79%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.65%

-28.79%

+2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.15%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-7.96%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.67%

-0.12%

Volatility

FFSM vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.14%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSMAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

4.14%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.99%

11.28%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

17.50%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

22.73%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

28.30%

-7.72%

FFSM vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSM vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.46%0.56%0.62%0.56%0.58%0.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFSM and AVUV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSM has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to AVUV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 10.42% for FFSM. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FFSM.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.46% for FFSM.

FFSM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FFSM and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSM and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer