PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFSM vs. FFLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FFSMFFLG
YTD Return21.85%33.57%
1Y Return34.58%43.85%
3Y Return (Ann)5.32%5.02%
Sharpe Ratio2.342.48
Sortino Ratio3.273.18
Omega Ratio1.411.45
Calmar Ratio2.832.32
Martin Ratio14.3012.55
Ulcer Index2.78%3.76%
Daily Std Dev16.99%19.08%
Max Drawdown-26.65%-44.52%
Current Drawdown-2.15%-0.31%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between FFSM and FFLG is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FFSM vs. FFLG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 21.85% return, which is significantly lower than FFLG's 33.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.02%
13.21%
FFSM
FFLG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFSM vs. FFLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLG's 0.38% expense ratio.


FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for FFSM: current value at 0.43% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.43%
Expense ratio chart for FFLG: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFSM vs. FFLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.41
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFSM, currently valued at 14.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0014.30
FFLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFLG, currently valued at 12.55, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.55

FFSM vs. FFLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FFLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSM and FFLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.34
2.48
FFSM
FFLG

Dividends

FFSM vs. FFLG - Dividend Comparison

FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than FFLG's 0.03% yield.


TTM202320222021
FFSM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
0.51%0.56%0.58%0.37%
FFLG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
0.03%0.00%1.50%0.55%

Drawdowns

FFSM vs. FFLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum FFLG drawdown of -44.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and FFLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.15%
-0.31%
FFSM
FFLG

Volatility

FFSM vs. FFLG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) at 5.27%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.16%
5.27%
FFSM
FFLG