PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UWM vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UWM vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UWM vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
-0.59%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.36%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 2.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UWM having a 9.88% annualized return and NOBL not far behind at 9.54%.


UWM

1D
7.02%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
1.22%
1Y
40.99%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
-3.44%
10Y*
9.88%

NOBL

1D
1.28%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
2.36%
6M
4.01%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UWM vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UWM vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UWM vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UWMNOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.40

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

0.68

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.09

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.66

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

2.36

+2.76

UWM vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UWMNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.40

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.44

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.58

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.64

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and NOBL is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UWM vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
1.04%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

UWM vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UWMNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.21%

-35.43%

-52.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.48%

-11.20%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.62%

-17.92%

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.46%

-35.43%

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.29%

-7.04%

-20.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.07%

-3.45%

-27.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

3.15%

+4.61%

Volatility

UWM vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.61%. This indicates that UWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UWMNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

3.61%

+11.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.72%

8.07%

+20.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.23%

15.29%

+30.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.05%

14.40%

+30.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.00%

16.60%

+29.40%