UWM vs. VTWO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO).
UWM and VTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 25, 2007. VTWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. Both UWM and VTWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UWM or VTWO.
Correlation
The correlation between UWM and VTWO is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
UWM vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UWM:
0.40
VTWO:
0.67
UWM:
0.84
VTWO:
1.07
UWM:
1.10
VTWO:
1.13
UWM:
0.34
VTWO:
0.74
UWM:
1.98
VTWO:
3.62
UWM:
8.44%
VTWO:
3.88%
UWM:
41.81%
VTWO:
20.95%
UWM:
-88.21%
VTWO:
-41.19%
UWM:
-35.17%
VTWO:
-8.60%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UWM having a 12.08% return and VTWO slightly lower at 11.51%. Over the past 10 years, UWM has underperformed VTWO with an annualized return of 7.05%, while VTWO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.96% annualized return.
UWM
12.08%
-6.80%
16.21%
12.39%
2.19%
7.05%
VTWO
11.51%
-3.25%
10.83%
11.80%
7.47%
7.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UWM vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UWM vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UWM vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than VTWO's 0.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000 | 0.98% | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.55% | 0.41% | 0.11% | 0.38% | 0.24% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 0.84% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
UWM vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, which is greater than VTWO's maximum drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and VTWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UWM vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) at 6.13%. This indicates that UWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.