UWM vs. TNA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

UWM (ProShares Ultra Russell2000) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UWM tracks the Russell 2000 Index (200%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UWM returned 11.65%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for TNA. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. UWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

UWM vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UWM achieves a 34.04% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 48.69% return. Over the past 10 years, UWM has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 11.65%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.13% annualized return.

UWM

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -4.73%
• 6M: 21.37%
• YTD: 34.04%
• 1Y: 71.18%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 11.65%
• ALL TIME*: 7.15%

TNA

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -7.22%
• 6M: 28.70%
• YTD: 48.69%
• 1Y: 108.54%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: -4.05%
• 10Y*: 7.13%
• ALL TIME*: 14.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	$284.85M	$300.19M	$411.47M
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	$17.68M	$17.26M	$19.83M

UWM vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	34.04%	13.59%	11.32%	22.62%	-43.69%	23.91%	16.57%	48.62%	-25.89%	26.92%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	48.69%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between UWM and TNA is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008	1.00

The correlation between UWM and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

UWM vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UWM	TNA
Financial Services	41.4%	17.5%
Healthcare	11.1%	20.3%
Technology	7.8%	14.8%
Industrials	7.6%	14.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	9.2%
Real Estate	4.0%	6.6%
Energy	3.4%	5.5%
Basic Materials	2.6%	4.4%
Utilities	1.8%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	2.6%
Communication Services	0.9%	2.2%

Return for Risk

UWM vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UWM

UWM Risk / Return Rank: 73
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 72
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UWM vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UWM	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.66	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.23	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.26	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	2.95	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.90	9.70	+0.21

UWM vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UWM and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UWM vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UWM drawdown since its inception was -88.21%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UWM and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UWM	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.21%	-88.09%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.28%	-32.53%	+10.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.79%	-65.78%	+15.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.62%	-82.36%	+20.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.46%	-88.09%	+16.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.49%	-37.12%	+30.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.65%	-33.92%	+3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.51%	9.90%	-3.39%

Volatility

UWM vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) is 7.49%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that UWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UWM	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.49%	11.41%	-3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.96%	42.11%	-14.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.46%	57.87%	-19.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.91%	67.19%	-22.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.02%	68.35%	-22.33%

UWM vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

UWM vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

UWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than TNA's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.31%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%
UWM ProShares Ultra Russell2000	0.84%	1.05%	1.16%	0.34%	0.40%	0.00%	0.07%	0.55%	0.41%	0.11%	0.27%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UWM and TNA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, UWM and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UWM or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to UWM (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UWM dropped -88.21% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, UWM or TNA?

On 10-year performance, UWM leads with 11.65% vs 7.13% for TNA. On fees, UWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UWM or TNA?

Over the 10-year period, UWM has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UWM or TNA?

UWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UWM or TNA?

UWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.31% for TNA.

What is the main difference between UWM and TNA?

UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UWM and 1.05% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.