PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMDD vs. EET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMDD vs. EET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 37.59% return, which is significantly lower than EET's 54.14% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has outperformed EET with an annualized return of 11.97%, while EET has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


UMDD

1D
-0.02%
1M
10.87%
YTD
37.59%
6M
37.25%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
25.91%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
11.97%

EET

1D
-2.52%
1M
17.51%
YTD
54.14%
6M
60.18%
1Y
118.88%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. EET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
37.59%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
54.14%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and EET is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.66

The correlation between UMDD and EET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

UMDD vs. EET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UMDD
EET

Industrials

13.6%

-

Technology

9.1%

-

Financial Services

7.5%
51.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%

-

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Energy

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Industrials

UMDD
13.6%
EET

-

Technology

UMDD
9.1%
EET

-

Financial Services

UMDD
7.5%
EET
51.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UMDD
5.2%
EET

-

Healthcare

UMDD
4.8%
EET

-

Real Estate

UMDD
4.1%
EET

-

Energy

UMDD
2.9%
EET

-

Basic Materials

UMDD
2.6%
EET

-

Consumer Defensive

UMDD
2.2%
EET

-

Utilities

UMDD
1.6%
EET

-

Communication Services

UMDD
0.5%
EET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMDD vs. EET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. EET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMDDEETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

3.02

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

3.33

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

4.53

-1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.51

16.64

-8.13

UMDD vs. EET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the EET Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and EET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMDDEETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

3.02

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.11

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.27

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.12

+0.20

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. EET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than EET's maximum drawdown of -71.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and EET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMDDEETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-71.66%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.04%

-26.38%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.33%

-34.89%

-25.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.61%

-64.88%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.24%

-69.07%

-17.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-2.52%

-3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-37.27%

+13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

7.17%

+0.59%

Volatility

UMDD vs. EET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 13.48%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a volatility of 17.46%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMDDEETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

17.46%

-3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.23%

34.52%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.79%

39.66%

+7.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.91%

37.78%

+21.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.28%

40.60%

+21.68%

UMDD vs. EET - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UMDD and EET have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UMDD vs. EET - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than EET's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.23%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.76%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMDD and EET have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to UMDD (13.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs EET's -71.66%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 11.97% vs 11.03% for EET. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 13.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UMDD and EET have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.76% for UMDD.

UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%).

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMDD and EET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer