UMDD vs. TQQQ
UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 13.11%/yr vs 45.48%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 38.16% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 13.11%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.48% annualized return.
UMDD
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 38.16%
- 6M
- 30.23%
- 1Y
- 64.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -9.86%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 41.43%
- 6M
- 35.75%
- 1Y
- 100.69%
- 3Y*
- 58.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 45.48%
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 38.16% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 41.43% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and TQQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between UMDD and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UMDD
TQQQ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
UMDD
TQQQ
Technology
UMDD
TQQQ
Financial Services
UMDD
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
UMDD
TQQQ
Healthcare
UMDD
TQQQ
Real Estate
UMDD
TQQQ
Energy
UMDD
TQQQ
Basic Materials
UMDD
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
UMDD
TQQQ
Utilities
UMDD
TQQQ
Communication Services
UMDD
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
TQQQ
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMDD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.74 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 8.72 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -81.66% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -36.97% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.33% | -58.04% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | -81.66% | +17.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | -81.66% | -4.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -14.65% | +9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -18.49% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 11.59% | -3.82% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 13.54%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.54% | 27.27% | -13.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.31% | 43.35% | -8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.51% | 53.39% | -5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.96% | 67.41% | -8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.23% | 66.32% | -4.09% |
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UMDD and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UMDD vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than TQQQ's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.42% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.76% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMDD and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to UMDD (13.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.48% vs 13.11% for UMDD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 13.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.48% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UMDD and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.42% for TQQQ.
UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMDD and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer