UMDD vs. URTY
UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while URTY tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 13.45%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for URTY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UMDD vs. URTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 42.38% return, which is significantly lower than URTY's 61.68% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has outperformed URTY with an annualized return of 13.45%, while URTY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
UMDD
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 10.37%
- YTD
- 42.38%
- 6M
- 33.72%
- 1Y
- 73.33%
- 3Y*
- 27.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
URTY
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 61.68%
- 6M
- 47.45%
- 1Y
- 140.09%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- -5.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
UMDD vs. URTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 42.38% | -2.57% | 19.68% | 27.21% | -49.60% | 72.27% | -17.30% | 78.90% | -40.29% | 49.17% |
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 61.68% | 9.26% | 7.38% | 24.43% | -62.81% | 28.47% | -7.72% | 72.37% | -39.59% | 38.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMDD and URTY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.94 |
The correlation between UMDD and URTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
UMDD vs. URTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UMDD
URTY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
UMDD
URTY
Technology
UMDD
URTY
Financial Services
UMDD
URTY
Consumer Cyclical
UMDD
URTY
Healthcare
UMDD
URTY
Real Estate
UMDD
URTY
Energy
UMDD
URTY
Basic Materials
UMDD
URTY
Consumer Defensive
UMDD
URTY
Utilities
UMDD
URTY
Communication Services
UMDD
URTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMDD vs. URTY — Risk / Return Rank
UMDD
URTY
UMDD vs. URTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMDD | URTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 4.33 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 14.18 | -4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMDD vs. URTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, roughly equal to the maximum URTY drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and URTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMDD | URTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -88.09% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.04% | -32.56% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.33% | -65.85% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.61% | -82.76% | +18.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.24% | -88.09% | +1.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -33.44% | +30.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -34.79% | +11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 9.92% | -2.15% |
Volatility
UMDD vs. URTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 13.05%, while ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a volatility of 19.52%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMDD | URTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 19.52% | -6.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.18% | 42.66% | -7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.50% | 59.00% | -11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.95% | 67.66% | -8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.35% | 69.49% | -7.14% |
UMDD vs. URTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UMDD and URTY have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UMDD vs. URTY - Dividend Comparison
UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than URTY's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 | 0.74% | 1.00% | 0.76% | 0.19% | 0.49% | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.64% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.06% |
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 0.58% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, UMDD and URTY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
URTY has higher volatility (19.52%) compared to UMDD (13.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs URTY's -88.09%.
On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 13.45% vs 9.89% for URTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 13.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UMDD and URTY have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.58% for URTY.
UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%).
URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMDD and URTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer