TMH vs. FDIS
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
TMH vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -4.54%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.56%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
TMH vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and FDIS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDIS
TMH vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum FDIS drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -39.16% | +28.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -6.85% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -7.49% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.07% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 18.75% | +7.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 23.99% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 22.33% | +3.61% |
TMH vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TMH vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than FDIS's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and FDIS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for TMH.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 0.75% for FDIS.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.08% for FDIS.
Find the right allocation for TMH and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer