TMH vs. BETZ
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.
Performance
TMH vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETZ
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- -10.44%
- 6M
- -10.50%
- 1Y
- -12.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- -8.72%
- 10Y*
- —
TMH vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and BETZ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BETZ
TMH vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -60.82% | +50.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -39.41% | +29.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -33.82% | +28.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.59% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 20.78% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 27.00% | -1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 27.95% | -2.01% |
TMH vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than BETZ's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.11% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and BETZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 5.11% for BETZ.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.75% for BETZ.
Find the right allocation for TMH and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer