TMH vs. RXI
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while RXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for RXI.
Performance
TMH vs. RXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RXI
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.27M | $3.01M | $2.20M | |
| $27.07K | $29.18K | $21.96K |
TMH vs. RXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.72% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and RXI is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. RXI — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RXI
TMH vs. RXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. RXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.32%, smaller than the maximum RXI drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and RXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -60.36% | +50.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -5.69% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -10.52% | +5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.99% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. RXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.85% | 17.04% | +9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 21.06% | +5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 20.10% | +6.75% |
TMH vs. RXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RXI's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. RXI - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than RXI's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and RXI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for RXI.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.42% for RXI.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.46% for RXI.
Find the right allocation for TMH and RXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer