TMH vs. PEJ
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while PEJ tracks the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PEJ.
Performance
TMH vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 18.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
TMH vs. PEJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and PEJ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. PEJ — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PEJ
TMH vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum PEJ drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and PEJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -66.03% | +55.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -0.76% | -9.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -12.29% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 18.44% | +7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 22.77% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 24.73% | +1.21% |
TMH vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than PEJ's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.51% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and PEJ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 0.51% for PEJ.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.55% for PEJ.
Find the right allocation for TMH and PEJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer