TMH vs. BEDZ
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. TMH is passively managed, while BEDZ is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.
Performance
TMH vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEDZ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 24.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
TMH vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and BEDZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEDZ
TMH vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum BEDZ drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and BEDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -29.70% | +19.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -0.92% | -9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -8.00% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 20.39% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 24.89% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 24.78% | +1.16% |
TMH vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than BEDZ's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.08% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 2.08% for BEDZ.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.99% for BEDZ.
Find the right allocation for TMH and BEDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer