TMH vs. BEDZ
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. TMH is passively managed, while BEDZ is actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.
Performance
TMH vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.96%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BEDZ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 18.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $65.74K | $44.95K | $74.21K | |
| $27.07K | $29.18K | $21.96K |
TMH vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.72% |
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 6.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and BEDZ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEDZ
TMH vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.32%, smaller than the maximum BEDZ drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and BEDZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -29.70% | +19.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -2.43% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -7.89% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | BEDZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.85% | 20.40% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 24.60% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 24.66% | +2.19% |
TMH vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than BEDZ's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.06% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.06% for BEDZ.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.99% for BEDZ.
Find the right allocation for TMH and BEDZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer