PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFS vs. CAFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMFS vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMFS vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
-8.10%-1.59%15.41%14.17%
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
7.31%0.17%6.95%20.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a -8.10% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 7.31% return.


TMFS

1D
3.19%
1M
-9.83%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-7.25%
1Y
-1.30%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
-3.08%
10Y*

CAFG

1D
2.95%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
7.31%
6M
5.20%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMFS vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMFS vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFS
TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CAFG
CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFS vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFSCAFGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

0.62

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.10

1.02

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.13

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.27

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.25

4.89

-5.14

TMFS vs. CAFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the CAFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and CAFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFSCAFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.62

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.60

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and CAFG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TMFS vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%2.65%
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.32%0.35%0.36%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and CAFG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFSCAFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-23.66%

-25.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-13.08%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.54%

-3.74%

-21.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-5.81%

-13.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

3.40%

+1.87%

Volatility

TMFS vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) is 6.89%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that TMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMFSCAFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

7.41%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

13.24%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

21.41%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

19.76%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.65%

19.76%

+5.89%