PortfoliosLab logo
TMFS vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and VOO is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

TMFS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
70.50%
128.76%
TMFS
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TMFS:

0.28

VOO:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

TMFS:

0.57

VOO:

0.88

Omega Ratio

TMFS:

1.07

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

TMFS:

0.20

VOO:

0.55

Martin Ratio

TMFS:

0.79

VOO:

2.27

Ulcer Index

TMFS:

8.44%

VOO:

4.55%

Daily Std Dev

TMFS:

23.93%

VOO:

19.19%

Max Drawdown

TMFS:

-48.79%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

TMFS:

-26.22%

VOO:

-9.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a -10.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -5.74% return.


TMFS

YTD

-10.38%

1M

-4.47%

6M

-7.55%

1Y

6.66%

5Y*

6.99%

10Y*

N/A

VOO

YTD

-5.74%

1M

-2.90%

6M

-4.28%

1Y

9.78%

5Y*

15.72%

10Y*

12.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMFS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for TMFS: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TMFS: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value is 0.03%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
VOO: 0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TMFS vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFS is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TMFS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
TMFS: 0.28
VOO: 0.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
TMFS: 0.57
VOO: 0.88
The chart of Omega ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
TMFS: 1.07
VOO: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
TMFS: 0.20
VOO: 0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
TMFS: 0.79
VOO: 2.27

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.28
0.54
TMFS
VOO

Dividends

TMFS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.38%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-26.22%
-9.90%
TMFS
VOO

Volatility

TMFS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a higher volatility of 15.24% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 13.96%. This indicates that TMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.24%
13.96%
TMFS
VOO