TMFS vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
TMFS and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFS is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Oct 29, 2018. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TMFS or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between TMFS and IWM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TMFS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TMFS:
1.15
IWM:
0.78
TMFS:
1.72
IWM:
1.23
TMFS:
1.21
IWM:
1.15
TMFS:
0.63
IWM:
0.87
TMFS:
4.74
IWM:
3.44
TMFS:
4.32%
IWM:
4.48%
TMFS:
17.79%
IWM:
19.69%
TMFS:
-48.79%
IWM:
-59.05%
TMFS:
-14.02%
IWM:
-5.99%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 2.83% return.
TMFS
4.43%
-1.06%
15.20%
19.00%
7.23%
N/A
IWM
2.83%
0.78%
7.51%
14.00%
7.53%
7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TMFS vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TMFS
IWM
TMFS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TMFS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% |
Drawdowns
TMFS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TMFS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) is 3.82%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that TMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.