PortfoliosLab logo
TMFS vs. TMFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and TMFC is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

TMFS vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
70.44%
188.70%
TMFS
TMFC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TMFS:

0.27

TMFC:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

TMFS:

0.56

TMFC:

1.23

Omega Ratio

TMFS:

1.07

TMFC:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

TMFS:

0.19

TMFC:

0.90

Martin Ratio

TMFS:

0.76

TMFC:

3.31

Ulcer Index

TMFS:

8.53%

TMFC:

5.43%

Daily Std Dev

TMFS:

23.93%

TMFC:

22.48%

Max Drawdown

TMFS:

-48.79%

TMFC:

-33.06%

Current Drawdown

TMFS:

-26.24%

TMFC:

-9.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a -10.41% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's -6.55% return.


TMFS

YTD

-10.41%

1M

-2.27%

6M

-8.62%

1Y

6.63%

5Y*

6.33%

10Y*

N/A

TMFC

YTD

-6.55%

1M

1.36%

6M

-1.93%

1Y

16.40%

5Y*

17.76%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMFS vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for TMFS: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TMFS: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for TMFC: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
TMFC: 0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TMFS vs. TMFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFS is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFS is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFS is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFS is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFC is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFC is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TMFS vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
TMFS: 0.27
TMFC: 0.80
The chart of Sortino ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
TMFS: 0.56
TMFC: 1.23
The chart of Omega ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
TMFS: 1.07
TMFC: 1.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
TMFS: 0.19
TMFC: 0.90
The chart of Martin ratio for TMFS, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
TMFS: 0.76
TMFC: 3.31

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.27
0.80
TMFS
TMFC

Dividends

TMFS vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%1.33%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.43%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.62%

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-26.24%
-9.91%
TMFS
TMFC

Volatility

TMFS vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) have volatilities of 15.24% and 15.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
15.24%
15.36%
TMFS
TMFC