PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFS vs. TMFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMFS vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMFS vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
-8.10%-1.59%15.41%25.40%-33.15%-2.38%58.52%40.19%-8.11%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
-8.08%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%42.00%34.70%-6.20%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TMFS having a -8.10% return and TMFC slightly higher at -8.08%.


TMFS

1D
3.19%
1M
-9.83%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-7.25%
1Y
-1.30%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
-3.08%
10Y*

TMFC

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-8.08%
6M
-6.33%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMFS vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMFS vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFS
TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFS vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFSTMFCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

0.93

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.10

1.47

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.21

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

1.52

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.25

5.42

-5.68

TMFS vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFSTMFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.93

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.64

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.74

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and TMFC is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TMFS vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%2.65%0.00%
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.16%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and TMFC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFSTMFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-33.06%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-12.64%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

-33.06%

-12.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.54%

-9.95%

-15.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-6.88%

-12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

3.54%

+1.73%

Volatility

TMFS vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 5.76%. This indicates that TMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMFSTMFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

5.76%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

10.52%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

20.21%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

20.43%

+2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.65%

22.14%

+3.51%