PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFS vs. TMFE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFS vs. TMFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than TMFE's 3.28% return.


TMFS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.83%
6M
0.91%
YTD
1.73%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
-1.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.16%

TMFE

1D
0.84%
1M
0.51%
6M
3.60%
YTD
3.28%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$297.07K$363.30K$442.18K
$105.61K$113.15K$201.92K

TMFS vs. TMFE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
1.73%-1.59%15.41%25.40%-33.15%0.49%
TMFE
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF
3.28%11.10%27.95%41.12%-25.84%-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFS and TMFE is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021

0.72

The correlation between TMFS and TMFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMFS vs. TMFE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFS
TMFE

Technology

24.5%
34.0%

Industrials

22.4%
4.4%

Healthcare

22.2%
8.8%

Financial Services

13.8%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
17.1%

Real Estate

5.2%
0.2%

Energy

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
10.2%

Communication Services

-

13.9%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TMFS
24.5%
TMFE
34.0%

Industrials

TMFS
22.4%
TMFE
4.4%

Healthcare

TMFS
22.2%
TMFE
8.8%

Financial Services

TMFS
13.8%
TMFE
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TMFS
7.4%
TMFE
17.1%

Real Estate

TMFS
5.2%
TMFE
0.2%

Energy

TMFS
2.4%
TMFE

-

Basic Materials

TMFS
2.1%
TMFE
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

TMFS
0.0%
TMFE
10.2%

Communication Services

TMFS

-

TMFE
13.9%

Utilities

TMFS

-

TMFE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFS vs. TMFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMFS
TMFS Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFE
TMFE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMFS vs. TMFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMFSTMFEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.12

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

0.76

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

2.72

-2.42

TMFS vs. TMFE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the TMFE Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFS and TMFE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMFS vs. TMFE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than TMFE's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and TMFE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFSTMFEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.79%

-31.21%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-11.30%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.05%

-18.81%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.58%

-1.12%

-16.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-8.12%

-11.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

3.14%

+2.56%

Volatility

TMFS vs. TMFE - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF (TMFE) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFSTMFEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.81%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

10.23%

+3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.75%

12.94%

+6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.97%

19.11%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.38%

19.11%

+6.27%

TMFS vs. TMFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFS vs. TMFE - Dividend Comparison

TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TMFE
The RBB Fund, Inc. - Motley Fool High Capital Efficiency Index ETF
0.31%0.32%0.44%0.45%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMFS
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.34%2.37%5.57%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFS and TMFE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMFS has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to TMFE (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFS dropped -48.79% vs TMFE's -31.21%.

On 3-year performance, TMFE leads with 16.49% vs 5.68% for TMFS. On fees, TMFE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TMFE has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMFE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.

TMFE has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.

TMFS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while TMFE is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and RBB Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFS and 0.50% for TMFE.

TMFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFS and TMFE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer