PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return.


TINY

1D
2.63%
1M
15.50%
YTD
59.78%
6M
60.21%
1Y
114.15%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
59.78%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.73%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and NOBL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between TINY and NOBL has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINY vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINY
NOBL

Technology

79.0%
3.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.7%

Basic Materials

7.7%
10.9%

Industrials

4.7%
20.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

12.4%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Technology

TINY
79.0%
NOBL
3.6%

Healthcare

TINY
8.6%
NOBL
9.7%

Basic Materials

TINY
7.7%
NOBL
10.9%

Industrials

TINY
4.7%
NOBL
20.3%

Communication Services

TINY

-

NOBL

-

Consumer Cyclical

TINY

-

NOBL
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

TINY

-

NOBL
23.5%

Energy

TINY

-

NOBL
3.4%

Financial Services

TINY

-

NOBL
12.4%

Real Estate

TINY

-

NOBL
4.6%

Utilities

TINY

-

NOBL
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINYNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.14

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.85

0.99

+5.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.13

2.58

+21.55

TINY vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINYNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

0.80

+2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.64

-0.07

Drawdowns

TINY vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-35.43%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

-9.11%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

-15.36%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.99%

+5.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-3.48%

-12.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

3.50%

+1.25%

Volatility

TINY vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

2.36%

+9.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

8.00%

+18.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

11.33%

+21.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.37%

14.38%

+17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.37%

16.60%

+15.77%

TINY vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than NOBL's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.18%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and NOBL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 8.01% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.35% for NOBL.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer